An automatic ticket for an incumbent governor or president refers to a situation where a sitting governor or president, as a political party member, seeks re-election and is typically guaranteed the party’s nomination without facing significant competition in a primary election. While the notion of incumbents receiving an automatic ticket is not new, it has precedents in established and advanced democracies globally.
It is a truism that certain critics view an automatic ticket for an incumbent as an aberration that hampers internal democracy or competition within viable party members. They argue that competitive elections foster a sense of participation, inclusion, and engagement within the party. However, it is essential to recognise that an automatic ticket policy does not inherently preclude internal discussion or engagement. A well-structured party can uphold democratic processes through thorough vetting and consensus-building among its members, even when no contested primary exists. This has happened in mature democracies around the world, with the political parties of the incumbent waxing stronger. The fear of implosion within the ruling party if a consensus candidate is endorsed is, therefore, jejune, pedestrian, and puerile.
Saliently and succinctly stated, it is possible to unite behind a capable incumbent while fostering internal harmony and inclusion. In a typically friendly and dynamic political landscape, where apparent opposition to the incumbent is seemingly silent, supporting the incumbent governor can enhance party cohesion, allowing members to work together unanimously toward common goals rather than entrenching unhealthy competition against one another within the same party.
This scenario often arises due to several factors, including the governor’s established political popularity, strong party loyalty, and perceived effective governance. In Ekiti, for instance, His Excellency, Mr. Biodun Abayomi Oyebanji, popularly called BAO by his numerous adherents and admirers, has distinguished himself as a unique political figure who understands the essence of collaborative and inclusive governance. He has displayed exemplary leadership acumen to most Ekitikete in colour, context, and content compared to any other man in the saddle since the creation of Ekiti State. His strategic and humane engagement with political personalities, regardless of their party affiliations, has endeared him to a broad spectrum of Ekiti residents. Furthermore, his uncommon style of interaction with the creme la creme of Ekiti, such as the likes of Aare Afe Babalola, SAN, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, Barrister Femi Falana, SAN, Senator Babafemi Ojudu, Senator Adeyeye, Senator Olujinmi, etc., is unique and uncommon in the political disposition in the land of honour.
Remarkably, Governor Oyebanji has maintained close rapport with party leaders while initiating populist projects, sustainable programmes, and various community development initiatives in his administration’s trajectory towards the shared prosperity mantra. He has cultivated a near-perfect relationship with political stakeholders in Ekiti, earning unprecedented loyalty, even from members of opposition parties. This unyielding acceptance further solidifies the case for his automatic adoption across party lines.
Ultimately, endorsing an automatic ticket for him within his party could be a strategic decision, yielding significant benefits for the party and the state. Contrary to the concerns that automatic ticket policy undermines internal democracy, it is crucial to reaffirm that such a policy does not diminish internal dialogue or engagement. A unified front around a capable incumbent like Governor Oyebanji can foster internal cohesion while channelling party efforts and resources towards collective and rewarding objectives.
Additionally, the claim that eliminating competitive primaries will negatively impact economic activity is oversimplified. It is widely known globally that good governance engenders and enhances economic activities much more than the ephemeral gains that organising a local primary election can garner for a set of people. In this vein, while campaigns naturally stimulate economic activity, the primary focus should always be on effective governance. Going this route will ensure resources tied up in lengthy primary battles could be redirected toward community development, building infrastructure, and programmes that directly benefit constituents. Political parties can also seek alternative funding methods and engagement strategies that do not depend exclusively on candidate campaigns for economic stimulation.
Concerns about power dynamics, particularly the risk of fostering an overly powerful incumbent, merit consideration, but an automatic ticket does not inherently lead to autocracy. An accountable incumbent, like Governor Oyebanji, can maintain transparency and governance structures that prevent the erosion of democratic practices. His proven trustworthiness and rapport with party members reduce the need for competitive pressures typically faced by lesser-known challengers.
While some may view guaranteed re-election as a pathway to complacency, this does not universally hold. An effective leader strives for excellence, motivated by a desire to fulfill campaign promises and enhance his legacy—traits Governor Oyebanji has consistently demonstrated. He has also shown a willingness to listen to critiques and comments from constituents, party members, and opposing politicians, using this feedback mechanism to remain engaged and responsive to the electorate’s needs.
The fear that an adoption policy will create internal division is unfounded, yet it is essential to emphasise that unity can thrive through shared vision and collective goals. In Ekiti and nationally, APC leadership has fostered an inclusive environment, supporting various aspirations while promoting collaboration through effective relationship management. This was manifested in the consensus endorsement of the erstwhile President Muhammadu Buhari for the ruling APC’s second-term ticket in the 2019 presidential election.
Those raising concerns about potential legal challenges surrounding the adoption policy must remember that the APC is a living party, adhering to constitutional provisions and adopting potential amendments that allow for consensus around a sole candidate. By ensuring all voices are heard in the decision-making process, the party can limit the risk of legal disputes while enhancing its legitimacy.
On political evolution and youth engagement, Governor Oyebanji’s automatic adoption will inject new life into youth inclusion in governance and policymaking. His advocacy for youth involvement bridges the gap between traditional power structures and the aspirations of younger generations, fostering a future-orientated political landscape. Initiatives prioritising youth engagement within the party will counteract any perceptions of exclusion that may emerge from the adoption policy.
Concerns about setting a dangerous precedent through an automatic ticket are unfounded. Recent examples worldwide demonstrate that incumbents can run with little opposition due to their popularity and party support. For instance, several incumbents in the United States, such as Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis and Iowa’s Governor Kim Reynolds, faced minimal challenges in their Republican primaries.
Given Ekiti’s unique political context, the apparent lack of opposition parties supports the strategic decision to adopt a candidate who has demonstrated both leadership and effectiveness. An automatic ticket for a respected incumbent like Governor Oyebanji is a pragmatic response to the current political landscape, emphasising stability rather than monopolisation of power.
In conclusion, while adopting an automatic ticket raises legitimate questions regarding democracy, governance, and party unity, it also presents an opportunity for strategic manoeuvring that can enhance the effectiveness of both the party and governance in Ekiti. Ultimately, balancing ensuring democratic practices and promoting effective leadership that addresses constituent needs is vital. Open dialogue and inclusive governance can mitigate concerns, resulting in a stronger, more cohesive party that effectively serves the people of Ekiti. Adopting an automatic ticket policy is not dismissing democracy but rather a tactical approach to party politics to promote stability, unity, and efficiency. By eliminating unnecessary competition, the party positions itself to face the general election with strength and purpose, allowing the incumbent to focus on delivering excellent governance.
Ours is Ile-iyi, Ile-eye, and an automatic ticket can serve as a tool to uphold this vision and prevent APC Ekiti State from unnecessary internal political bickerings. Hence, an automatic ticket for Governor Biodun Abayomi Oyebanji (BAO) is good for the soul of the ruling party, APC.
*By Dr. JMO Ekundayo and Barrister Wale Ojo-Lanre, on behalf of BAO BACKERS 2030
